Why are some ANSI ISO Standard library functions showing you

.NET C C++ CSS DBA General HTML Java JavaScript JSP JUnit MySQL Networking Oracle Perl Perl PHP PL/SQL RSS Software QA SQL Server Struts Unix Windows XHTML XML

Home Hot About Collections Index RSS Atom Ask

Tester Developer DBA Windows JAR DLL Files Certificates RegEx Links Q&A Biotech Phones Travel FAQ Forum

Home > C

Why are some ANSI/ISO Standard library functions showing up as undefined, even though I've got an ANSI compiler?

✍: Guest

It's possible to have a compiler available which accepts ANSI syntax, but not to have ANSI-compatible header files or run-time libraries installed. (In fact, this situation is rather common when using a non-vendor-supplied compiler such as gcc.)

2015-11-30, 1673👍, 0💬

People seem to make a point of distinguishing between ...
People seem to make a point of distinguishing between implementation-defined, unspecified, and undefined behavior. What do these mean? First of all, all three of these represent areas in which the C Standard does not specify exactly what a particular construct, or a program which uses it, must do. T... 2015-11-23, 1985👍, 0💬

Why wont the Frobozz Magic C Compiler ...
Why won't the Frobozz Magic C Compiler, which claims to be ANSI compliant, accept this code? I know that the code is ANSI, because gcc accepts it. Many compilers support a few non-Standard extensions, gcc more so than most. Are you sure that the code being rejected doesn't rely on such an extension?... 2015-11-25, 1851👍, 0💬

Why does the ANSI Standard place limits on the length and case-significance of external identifiers?
Why does the ANSI Standard place limits on the length and case-significance of external identifiers? The problem is linkers which are under control of neither the ANSI/ISO Standard nor the C compiler developers on the systems which have them. The limitation is only that identifiers be significant in... 2015-12-04, 1793👍, 0💬

What was noalias and what ever happened to it?
What was noalias and what ever happened to it? noalias was another type qualifier, in the same syntactic class as const and volatile, which was intended to assert that an object was not pointed to (``aliased'') by other pointers. The primary application, which is an important one, would have been fo... 2015-12-02, 1758👍, 0💬

What does the message Automatic aggregate intialization is an ANSI feature mean?
What does the message Automatic aggregate intialization is an ANSI feature'' mean? My compiler is complaining about valid ANSI code. Messages like these are typically emitted by pre-ANSI compilers which have been upgraded just enough to detect (but not properly translate) new C features which were i... 2015-11-30, 1757👍, 0💬

Wy compiler is rejecting the simplest possible test programs ...
My compiler is rejecting the simplest possible test programs, with all kinds of syntax errors. It's complaining about the first line of main(int argc, char **argv) { return 0; } Perhaps it is a pre-ANSI compiler, unable to accept function prototypes and the like. If you don't have access to an ANSI ... 2015-12-02, 1732👍, 0💬

What does it really mean for a program to be legal or `valid or ``conforming?
What does it really mean for a program to be legal or `valid or ``conforming? Simply stated, the Standard talks about three kinds of conformance: conforming programs, strictly conforming programs, and conforming implementations. A conforming program is one that is accepted by a conforming implementa... 2015-11-23, 1721👍, 0💬

Why are some ANSI ISO Standard library functions showing you
Why are some ANSI/ISO Standard library functions showing up as undefined, even though I've got an ANSI compiler? It's possible to have a compiler available which accepts ANSI syntax, but not to have ANSI-compatible header files or run-time libraries installed. (In fact, this situation is rather comm... 2015-11-30, 1674👍, 0💬

What should malloc0 do? Return a null pointer or a pointer to 0 bytes?
What should malloc0 do? Return a null pointer or a pointer to 0 bytes? The ANSI/ISO Standard says that it may do either; the behavior is implementation-defined Portable code must either take care not to call malloc(0), or be prepared for the possibility of a null return. 2015-12-04, 1669👍, 0💬

.NET C C++ CSS DBA General HTML Java JavaScript JSP JUnit MySQL Networking Oracle Perl Perl PHP PL/SQL RSS Software QA SQL Server Struts Unix Windows XHTML XML

Home Hot About Collections Index RSS Atom Ask

Tester Developer DBA Windows JAR DLL Files Certificates RegEx Links Q&A Biotech Phones Travel FAQ Forum

All rights in the contents of this web site are reserved by the individual author. fyicenter.com does not guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any contents.