Categories:
.NET (357)
C (330)
C++ (183)
CSS (84)
DBA (2)
General (7)
HTML (4)
Java (574)
JavaScript (106)
JSP (66)
Oracle (114)
Perl (46)
Perl (1)
PHP (1)
PL/SQL (1)
RSS (51)
Software QA (13)
SQL Server (1)
Windows (1)
XHTML (173)
Other Resources:
Should I use symbolic names like TRUE and FALSE for Boolean constants, or plain 1 and 0?
Should I use symbolic names like TRUE and FALSE for Boolean constants, or plain 1 and 0?
✍: Guest
It's your choice. Preprocessor macros like TRUE and FALSE (and, of course, NULL) are used for code readability, not because the underlying values might ever change. It's a matter of style, not correctness, whether to use symbolic names or raw 1/0 values.
On the one hand, using a symbolic name like TRUE or FALSE reminds the reader that a Boolean value is involved. On the other hand, Boolean values and definitions can evidently be confusing, and some programmers feel that TRUE and FALSE macros only compound the confusion.
2016-02-29, 1229👍, 0💬
Popular Posts:
What are secure and non-secure websites? A secure Website uses the Secure Socket Layer (SSL) protoco...
What Are the Parameter Modes Supported by PL/SQL? - Oracle DBA FAQ - Creating Your Own PL/SQL Proced...
Does .NET support UNICODE and how do you know it supports? Yes .NET definitely supports UNICODE. Try...
How do I install JUnit? First I will download the lastest version of JUnit. Then I will extract all ...
.NET INTERVIEW QUESTIONS - What is the difference between System exceptions and Application exceptio...