Categories:
.NET (357)
C (330)
C++ (183)
CSS (84)
DBA (2)
General (7)
HTML (4)
Java (574)
JavaScript (106)
JSP (66)
Oracle (114)
Perl (46)
Perl (1)
PHP (1)
PL/SQL (1)
RSS (51)
Software QA (13)
SQL Server (1)
Windows (1)
XHTML (173)
Other Resources:
Why are the interfaces more flexible than abstract classes?
Why are the interfaces more flexible than abstract classes?
✍: Guest
--An interface-defined type can be implemented by any class in a class hierarchy and can be extended by another interface. In contrast, an abstract-class-defined type can be implemented only by classes that subclass the abstract class.
--An interface-defined type can be used well in polymorphism. The so-called interface type vs. implementation types.
--Abstract classes evolve more easily than interfaces. If you add a new concrete method to an abstract class, the hierarchy system is still working. If you add a method to an interface, the classes that rely on the interface will break when recompiled.
--Generally, use interfaces for flexibility; use abstract classes for ease of evolution (like expanding class functionality).
2013-03-06, 2138👍, 0💬
Popular Posts:
How can I use tables to structure forms Small forms are sometimes placed within a TD element within ...
How To Divide Query Output into Groups? - MySQL FAQs - SQL SELECT Query Statements with GROUP BY You...
What is the output of printf("%d")? 1. When we write printf("%d",x); this means compiler will print ...
. How can a servlet refresh automatically if some new data has entered the database? You can use a c...
How can I enable session tracking for JSP pages if the browser has disabled cookies? We know that se...