Categories:
.NET (357)
C (330)
C++ (183)
CSS (84)
DBA (2)
General (7)
HTML (4)
Java (574)
JavaScript (106)
JSP (66)
Oracle (114)
Perl (46)
Perl (1)
PHP (1)
PL/SQL (1)
RSS (51)
Software QA (13)
SQL Server (1)
Windows (1)
XHTML (173)
Other Resources:
What is the basic difference between the 2 approaches to exception handling.
520. What is the basic difference between the 2 approaches to exception handling.
1. try catch block and
2. specifying the candidate exceptions in the throws clause?
When should you use which approach?
✍: Guest
In the first approach as a programmer of the method, you urself are dealing with the exception. This is fine if you are in a best position to decide should be done in case of an exception. Whereas if it is not the responsibility of the method to deal with it's own exceptions, then do not use this approach. In this case use the second approach. In the second approach we are forcing the caller of the method to catch the exceptions, that the method is likely to throw. This is often the approach library creators use. They list the exception in the throws clause and we must catch them. You will find the same approach throughout the java libraries we use.
2013-06-03, 1945👍, 0💬
Popular Posts:
What are the different elements in Functions points? The different elements in function points are a...
Can a variable be both const and volatile? Yes. The const modifier means that this code cannot chang...
Wha is the output from System.out.println("Hell o"+null);?Hellonull
Can one execute dynamic SQL from Forms? Yes, use the FORMS_DDL built-in or call the DBMS_SQL databas...
How many types of validation controls are provided by ASP.NET ? There are six main types of validati...