Categories:
.NET (357)
C (330)
C++ (184)
CSS (84)
DBA (2)
General (7)
HTML (4)
Java (574)
JavaScript (106)
JSP (66)
Oracle (114)
Perl (46)
Perl (1)
PHP (2)
PL/SQL (1)
RSS (51)
Software QA (13)
SQL Server (1)
Struts (1)
Windows (1)
XHTML (173)
Other Resources:
Enabling notification for individual tables
Enabling notification for individual tables
✍: Guest
Once the necessary stored procedure and tables are created then we have to notify saying
which table needs to be enabled for notifications.
That can be achieved by two ways:-
ã aspnet_regsql -et -E -d Northwind -t Products
ã Exec spNet_SqlCacheRegisterTableStoredProcedure 'TableName'
Registering tables for notification internally creates triggerfor the tables. For instance for
a “products” table the following trigger is created. So any modifications done to the
“Products” table will update the “AspNet_SqlCacheNotification’ table.
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.[Products_AspNet_SqlCacheNotification_Trigger] ON [Products] FOR INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON EXEC dbo.AspNet_SqlCacheUpdateChangeIdStoredProcedure N'Products‘ END
“AspNet_SqlCacheTablesForChangeNotification” contains a single record for every table
you're monitoring. When you make a change in the table (such as inserting, deleting or
updating a record), the change Id column is incremented by 1.ASP.NET queries this table
repeatedly keeps track of the most recent changed values for every table. When this
value changes in a subsequent read, ASP.NET knows that the table has changed.
2007-10-23, 5654👍, 0💬
Popular Posts:
How To Insert Multiple Rows with a SELECT Statement? - MySQL FAQs - Managing Tables and Running Quer...
How To Enter Microseconds in SQL Statements? - MySQL FAQs - Introduction to SQL Date and Time Handli...
How To Divide Query Output into Groups? - MySQL FAQs - SQL SELECT Query Statements with GROUP BY You...
What is difference between ADPATCH and OPATCH ? # ADPATCH is utility to apply ORACLE application Pat...
How can we implement singleton pattern in .NET? Singleton pattern mainly focuses on having one and o...